Joint Replacement Outcomes & Quality

Measuring what matters to patients

When considering hip or knee replacement, patients want to know more than how the procedure is performed. They want to understand how patients recover, how much pain and function improve, and how safely surgery can be completed.

Dr. Gill tracks patient-reported outcomes and clinical quality measures following primary hip and knee replacement. These results help evaluate the entire treatment process—from surgical planning and recovery protocols to long-term improvement in mobility and function.

Illustration of total hip and total knee replacement implants representing measured joint replacement outcomes.

Joint Replacement Experience

543

Primary hip and knee replacements tracked from 2024 through July 2026

396 (72.9%) performed at ASC, 147 (27.1%) performed at hospital

0.5%

Periprosthetic joint infection rate

2 infections among 396 ASC joint replacement procedures

98%+

Hip and knee replacement patients discharged directly home

These clinical quality measures reflect primary joint replacement procedures performed at the Watauga Orthopaedics Center for Advanced Bone and Joint Surgery during the 2024–2026 reporting period. The infection rate represents infections identified and recorded during the reporting period. No surgical outcome is guaranteed, and individual risks vary.

Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes

Patient-reported outcome measures, commonly called PROMs, allow patients to describe their pain, mobility, and ability to perform everyday activities before and after surgery.

Hip replacement patients complete the HOOS Jr., while knee replacement patients complete the KOOS Jr. Both are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better joint function and fewer symptoms.

These scores are not percentages of satisfied patients. They are standardized measures used to track how pain and function change following joint replacement.

Anterior Hip Replacement

Improvement in pain and function

Patient-reported outcomes were available for 246 total hip replacement patients.

Graph showing improvement in average HOOS Jr. scores following total hip replacement, with higher scores representing better hip function and fewer symptoms.
Graph showing improvement in average HOOS Jr. scores following total hip replacement, with higher scores representing better hip function and fewer symptoms.

49.9

Average HOOS Jr. score before surgery

82.4

Average HOOS Jr. score at one year

+ 32.5 points

Average improvement at one year

98.9%

Discharged directly home after surgery

On average, patients reported substantial improvement in hip pain, mobility, and daily function during the first year following total hip replacement.

Most anterior hip replacements are performed using a structured outpatient pathway when medically appropriate.

Robotic-Assisted Knee Replacement

Improvement in pain and function

Patient-reported outcomes were available for 315 total knee replacement patients.

Graph showing improvement in average KOOS Jr. scores following total knee replacement, with higher scores representing better knee function and fewer symptoms.

48.1

Average KOOS Jr. score before surgery

72.3

Average KOOS Jr. score at one year

+ 24.2 points

Average improvement at one year

98.6%

Discharged directly home after surgery

On average, patients reported substantial improvement in knee pain, mobility, and daily function during the first year following total knee replacement.

Robotic assistance, individualized implant positioning, multimodal pain management, and structured rehabilitation are incorporated into the treatment pathway.

Understanding These Results

Patient-Reported Improvement

HOOS Jr. and KOOS Jr. scores measure pain, mobility, and everyday joint function from the patient’s perspective. Higher scores indicate better function and fewer symptoms.

Home Discharge

Home discharge means the patient was able to return directly home after surgery instead of being admitted to a hospital or transferred to another facility.

Infection Rate

The infection rate reflects postoperative infections recorded in the surgery center’s quality data during the reporting period. Infection is an uncommon but recognized risk of joint replacement surgery.

Outpatient Joint Replacement in Johnson City

Watauga Orthopaedics Center for Advanced Bone and Joint Surgery, an AAAHC Center of Excellence for Joint Replacement.

Most of Dr. Gill’s joint replacement procedures are performed at the Watauga Orthopaedics Center for Advanced Bone and Joint Surgery, an AAAHC Center of Excellence for Joint Replacement.

The outpatient joint replacement pathway includes:

  • Preoperative medical screening and optimization

  • Patient and family education

  • Contemporary anesthesia and pain-control protocols

  • Mobilization shortly after surgery

  • Coordinated physical therapy and postoperative follow-up

  • Direct access to the clinical team when concerns arise

Not every patient is an appropriate candidate for outpatient surgery. The surgical setting is selected based on medical history, available support, procedure type, and individual safety considerations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Considering Hip or Knee Replacement?

If joint pain is limiting your mobility, sleep, work, or quality of life, a focused orthopedic evaluation can help determine whether joint replacement is appropriate.

Dr. Gill provides anterior hip replacement, robotic-assisted total knee replacement, and partial knee replacement for patients in Johnson City and throughout East Tennessee.

About the Data

Procedure-volume data include 543 primary hip and knee replacements and conversion procedures performed from January 2024 through July 2026. Of these procedures, 396 (72.9%) were performed at the ambulatory surgery center and 147 (27.1%) were performed at the hospital. Revision procedures are not included in these totals.

ASC quality measures are calculated separately using the 396 procedures performed at the Watauga Orthopaedics Center for Advanced Bone and Joint Surgery. Patient-reported outcome results are derived from separate datasets of hip and knee replacement patients with available HOOS Jr. or KOOS Jr. data. Patient counts may vary by follow-up interval. Group averages do not predict or guarantee an individual patient’s result. Data updated August 2026.